Record IP framing of the three products: 3 patent applications + 3 marks (StarForth, StarshipOS/LithosAnanke, Compudynamics)
The three-product split is treated as three patent applications, each matched
to a trademark (decided 2026-08-29):
- Patent 1 + mark StarForth -> hosted/interpreted runtime
- Patent 2 + marks StarshipOS (canonical spelling; noted as "StarshopOS"
in the decision words) + LithosAnanke -> full standalone OS
- Patent 3 + mark Compudynamics -> Zynq steady-state machinery
with sealed executions, HOL-proven, anchored by the physics-adaptive runtime
Flagged open for counsel (not assumed/filed): the repo already carries a
"Patent pending" USPTO provisional filed Dec 2025 for the Compudynamics
physics-adaptive runtime (docs/patent/). Whether patent 3 is a continuation/
refinement of that provisional, and whether the three product applications are
additive to or fold it in, must be reconciled. Records intent only; no legal
text drafted or filed. Authoritative form in ROADMAP.md; FABRIC-3.md tracks it.
This commit is contained in:
+10
@@ -3512,3 +3512,13 @@ product: hardware-enforced sealed executions and steady-state machinery machine-
|
||||
proof assistant (HOL); delivery is the bitstream + HOL proof artifacts. Product 3 is born on
|
||||
the FPGA and its existence is what cleanly separates 1 from 2 from 3. Full form in
|
||||
`ROADMAP.md` "Release Versioning Policy → The FPGA creates a three-product split".
|
||||
|
||||
**IP framing, decided 2026-08-29.** The three products are treated as three patent
|
||||
applications with a matching mark each: Patent 1 + **StarForth** (hosted runtime); Patent 2 +
|
||||
**StarshipOS + LithosAnanke** (full standalone OS); Patent 3 + **Compudynamics** (Zynq
|
||||
steady-state/sealed-execution HOL-proven hardware, anchored by the physics-adaptive runtime).
|
||||
Open for reconciliation with counsel: the repo already has a **"Patent pending"** USPTO
|
||||
provisional (filed Dec 2025) for the Compudynamics physics-adaptive runtime (`docs/patent/`);
|
||||
patent 3 and the three product applications must be positioned relative to it (continuation?
|
||||
additive?) — recorded as intent here, nothing filed or drafted. Authoritative form in
|
||||
`ROADMAP.md` "IP framing of the three products".
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user