Verification only, no permanent code (matches this item's own title
and 4.4i's same-shape precedent -- 4.4l-4.4o were geometry decisions,
not drawing code). One-shot diagnostic probe in sk_repl() drew 4.4o's
box outline plus a strip-top marker, then was reverted after capture
per this document's write/run-once/capture/revert discipline.
Measured pixel bounds directly from each screendump (not eyeballed)
and confirmed exact matches against 4.4o's computed coordinates on
all three architectures: amd64 box x:[320,959] y:[104,583], strip
marker y:704; aarch64/riscv64 box x:[80,719] y:[4,483], strip marker
y:504.
Observed, not fixed here: on the small architectures the REPL banner
text visibly overlaps the box's top edge, because vt100's cursor grid
still spans the whole screen rather than being confined to the 96px
strip -- a real gap between the landed REPL path and the mockup,
belongs to 4.4q/4.4r's wiring work, not this item.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
No code changes -- investigation/verification only. Injected a raw SGR
escape sequence over the serial socket at the ok> prompt (composed from
EMIT + ." since no FORTH word emits a literal ESC byte + text
directly): 27 EMIT ." [95mCOLOR-TEST" 27 EMIT ." [39m", bright magenta
(the p>=90&&p<=97 branch in apply_sgr()), a third SGR code path
distinct from 4.4h's already-verified truecolor prompt.
Screendump on all three architectures confirms COLOR-TEST renders in
bright magenta via the 4.4j-retargeted TTF draw call, proving the SGR
parser and the new glyph backend work together end-to-end, not just
independently. First screendump evidence ever captured for
aarch64/riscv64 in this document -- every prior screendump item was
amd64-only with that gap explicitly accepted; incidentally closed here
via the QEMU monitor screendump command against each arch's own
display device (ramfb for aarch64/riscv64). Both confirmed booting at
800x600.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
